### Read & Download The Poincaré Conjecture In Search of the Shape of the Universe

T 2006 He also will almost certainly share a Clay Institute millennium awardIn telling the vibrant story of The Poincaré Conjecture Donal O'Shea makes accessible to general readers for the first time the meaning of the conjecture and brings alive the field of mathematics and the achievements of generations of mathematicians whose work have led to Perelman's proof of this famous conjectu As a recent grad student in mathematics I found this book incredibly interesting It made me want to go on and get my PhD in manifold theory

### Free read Þ eBook, PDF or Kindle ePUB ☆ Donal O'Shea

Henri Poincaré was one of the greatest mathematicians of the late nineteenth and early twentieth century He revolutionized the field of topology which studies properties of geometric configurations that are unchanged by stretching or twisting The Poincaré conjecture lies at the heart of modern geometry and topology and even pertains to the possible shape of the universe The conjecture There was some explanation earlier in the book but later explanation was poor I came away with little understanding of how the Poincare conjecture was solved The book was a disappointment but did provide a reference to book by Jeffrey Weeks that might offer better layman level explanations of topological concepts El talmud de Viena in the book but later explanation was poor I came away with little understanding of how the Poincare conjecture was solved The book was a disappointment but did provide a reference to book by Jeffrey Weeks that might offer better layman level explanations of topological concepts

### Donal O'Shea ☆ 7 Download

States that there is only one shape possible for a finite universe in which every loop can be contracted to a single pointPoincaré's conjecture is one of the seven millennium problems that bring a one million dollar award for a solution Grigory Perelman a Russian mathematician has offered a proof that is likely to win the Fields Medal the mathematical euivalent of a Nobel prize in Augus Why is this book not widely read It s at least as good as books like Fermat s Last Theorem with far mathematical content If any layman wants a glimpse into the world of top level mathematics I cannot recommend a better book

My meeting with this book fell considerably short of love at first sight Not saw it on sale yesterday at a Melbou

So – the shape of the universe It’s a giant ball right Especially when you think of its beginning in a big bang But that brings up the awkward uestion of what’s outside the ball Space universe is not infinite It’s believed to be finite but without a boundary It becomes easier to understand this if you con

There was some explanation earlier in the book but later explanation was poor I came away with little understanding of how the Poincare conjecture was solved The book was a disappointment but did provide a reference to book by Jeffrey Weeks

Why is this book not widely read It's at least as good as books like Fermat's Last Theorem with far mathematical content If any layman wants a glimpse into the world of top level mathematics I cannot recommend a better book

I've been interested in the Millennium problems since I first read about them several years ago It was exciting to read about the first one to be solved I never took topology in college though so I have to admit that much of this went right over my head If you wanted to know without reading all the math yes the Poincare conjecture turned ou

This book was in the 'mathematics' section in the library and I was expecting something mathematics focused Hence I was di

As a recent grad student in mathematics I found this book incredibly interesting It made me want to go on and get my PhD in manifold theory

The fact is I would need infinitive sets of lifes to read all the books I want and another set of infinitive lifes to put into practice everything I read in all the books I would achieve to read in those other infinite sets of lifes certainly an infinite number of books And yet I would need an infinite memory to recall all the things I learn from them and correct maybe all the infinite sets of mistakes I wou

This was a decent book but a bit of a hard readFirstly the book introduces many concepts by name with some short descriptions and then goes on to discuss them in some ualitative detail; how one concept leads to another; how concepts fail to connect For me at least this was difficult to follow Granted in order to truly understand what is being discussed you would need to understand the mathematics; perhaps thi

This book was about as painful as reading the book of Genesis its pages mostly comprise a chronological list of mathematicians and so and so's work begot so and so's thesis interspersed with definitions sans explanation or example a group a ring etc The highlights were the only occasional example of geometry in mathematical physics