{Pdf} The Leprechauns of Software Engineering ✓ Laurent Bossavit


  • ebook
  • 183
  • The Leprechauns of Software Engineering
  • Laurent Bossavit
  • English
  • 15 May 2019
  • null

10 thoughts on “The Leprechauns of Software Engineering

  1. says:

    'Software engineering' tries hard to be a 'real science' In the last four decades some claims have gained general acceptance 10x developers exist and defects become costly to fix the later they're discovered These claims are often followed b

  2. says:

    This is a confusing and ultimately uite frustrating book The basic premise is good the software development field is full of received wisdom that has mutated over time from simple reasonable hypotheses to being treated as established fact supported by research But when you dig under the surface a little you discover that the researc

  3. says:

    This book debunks many myths in software engineers it's a great read and challenges what we know about our industry I recommended this to a fr

  4. says:

    This is one of those books that should have been a blog post or few The author argues some “established facts” in software engineering and the papers that spawned them I’ll list them below The cone of uncertainty Uber programmers are 10 times productive than simpletons Waterfall doesn’t suck it was invented to have something to compare with newer and better development life cycles The later you find a bug costly it is to f

  5. says:

    Are you in IT? If so you must read this book There're a plenty of fallacies circulating which are based on unverified statements This book busts most popular but which is important it teaches an industry newcomer or even a seasoned professional to doubt bold sayings and ask right uestions to figure out what forms the foundation of those sayings

  6. says:

    Well researched debunking of some of the most stubborn myths in software engineering combined with a thorough case for critical thinking in software engineering For some reason I was constantly reminded of Facts and Fallacies of Software Engineering as one of the possible offenders I should probably reread thatIf I have to pick a negative point with this book it's the uality of writing which is easily overcome by the uality of

  7. says:

    A brilliant book While the presentation could use some touching up the contents are well worth the modest Leanpub price This should be mandat

  8. says:

    TL;DR Bassavit demonstrates that several widely cited claims about software engineering are not really rooted in convincing empirical evidenceI'm impressed by the research and the clarity of thought He uite successfully takes down these leprec

  9. says:

    pretty much what I got from this is that you can't trust a lot of meme rules of thumb in software engineering the science

  10. says:

    If you've ever felt like there is something fundamentally wrong with the way software is developed in a projectenterprise environment then this book is for you The author shows you how a few cornerstones of the software engineerings discipline are fundamentally flawed It's a pretty uick read and I enjoyed it

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Laurent Bossavit à 8 characters

The Leprechauns of Software Engineering

Ts of this telephone game are generally considered cornerstone truths of the discipline to the point that their acceptance now seems to hinder further progressIn this short ebook we will take a look at some of those ground truths the claimed 10x variation in productivity between developers; the software crisis; the cost of change curve; the cone of unce. Are you in IT If so you must read this book There re a plenty of fallacies circulating which are based on unverified statements This book busts most popular but which is important it teaches an industry newcomer or even a seasoned professional to doubt bold sayings and ask right uestions to figure out what forms the foundation of those sayings

Read & Download ë eBook, ePUB or Kindle PDF à Laurent Bossavit

The software profession has a problem widely recognized but which nobody seems willing to do anything about You can think of this problem as a variant of the well known telephone game where some trivial rumor is repeated from one person to the next until it has become distorted beyond recognition and blown up out of all proportionUnfortunately the objec. Software engineering tries hard to be a real science In the last four decades some claims have gained general acceptance 10x developers exist and defects become costly to fix the later they re discovered These claims are often followed by a list of imposing citationsIn The Leprechauns of Software Engineering Laurent Bossavit chases down the sources of these accepted facts and in the process demonstrates that there s no science behind themWhile he explains in detail how he manages to unravel the various citations in order to get to the heart of the matter the book is easy to read At times it s like reading a thriller I was literally turning pages and didn t want to put the book downThere s a risk that I suffer from confirmation bias but this could be one of the decade s most important books about software developmentMy only problem with the book is that I feel that I should not take citations for granted Instead in its spirit I should get to the original sources in order to verify that the author hasn t misrepresented them It s just that if we are to believe Laurent Bossavit that s a major undertaking For now then I ll choose to believe himI strongly recommend this book for all with an interest in software development

Free download The Leprechauns of Software Engineering

Rtainty; and We'll hone our scholarship skills by looking up the original source for these ideas and taking a deep dive in the history of their development We'll assess the real weight of the evidence behind these ideasAnd we'll confront the scary prospect of moving the state of the art forward in a discipline that has had the ground kicked from under i. TL DR Bassavit demonstrates that several widely cited claims about software engineering are not really rooted in convincing empirical evidenceI m impressed by the research and the clarity of thought He uite successfully takes down these leprechauns I think but as he admits he doesn t construct any sort of alternative epistemology He weakly suggests that we should raise our standards for empirical research and also maybe borrow techniues from the social sciencesI think Bassavit is a little bit too dismissive of anecdote and folk wisdom possessed by professional programmers He is right in condemning those who present eg the cost of defects is higher the later they are discovered as having the authority of empirical science behind it but that doesn t necessarily mean there is no other basis for software engineers to subscribe to this idea Economists for example are not afraid to posit generalizations about how the economy works based purely on mathematical models they think plausibly capture characteristics of real markets in situations where the empirical evidence is lacking or ambiguous or when the mechanism they are analyzing is suspected of being too non linearcomplicated for a statistical test to be plausibleIn fact they will often present their arguments using demand curves and production possibility frontiers generated from theory not from data that resemble in some ways the cone of confidence and upward sloping cost of defect discovery diagrams that Bassavit is so affronted byThe lesson I would take away from Bassavit s deconstruction is stop attributing any inherent authority to scholarly citations stop pattern matching on the scientific method as a substitute for critical reasoning devote less effort to the dubious project of imitating the methods of experimental science and effort to improving our mental models of software engineering by introspective not empirical means